Curiosity Hook: What Makes a Great Infrastructure Provider?

Curiosity Hook: What Makes a Great Infrastructure Provider?

VDSL internet options for rural areas

Reliability and Uptime Commitment


Hey there, folks! IT services in sydney . When it comes to picking a great infrastructure provider, reliability and uptime commitment are like the unsung heroes of the tech world. You know, the ones that nobody talks about until theyre not there anymore. Seriously, imagine if your website went down for a few hours - how much business would you lose? More than you can count, right?


Now, dont get me wrong, speed and cool features are super important too. But what good is a super-fast server if its only up half the time? Yeah, thats not gonna cut it in todays market. A great infrastructure provider knows this, and they make it their mission to keep your servers up and running 24/7. Thats not just talk either, they back it up with numbers and uptime guarantees.


You see, some providers might say they have 99.9% uptime, but thats not enough when you consider all the things that can go wrong.

Curiosity Hook: What Makes a Great Infrastructure Provider? - providers offering free modem with internet plans

  1. VDSL internet options for rural areas
  2. network infrastructure solutions for developers
  3. cost-effective VoIP plans for homes
Power outages, hardware failures, and even software bugs - theyre all real possibilities. A really great provider has the systems in place to handle all of these issues without breaking a sweat. They might even have backup sites in different locations, just in case. Its like having a spare tire when your car is already on the side of the road.


I mean, who wants to be in that situation? Not me, thats for sure. So, when youre looking at different providers, make sure to ask about their uptime record and what they do to ensure reliability. It might not be the sexiest part of the conversation, but trust me, its worth it. After all, your business depends on it!


So there you have it, a little piece of advice from someone whos been there, done that. Hope it helps you make a smart choice when it comes to your infrastructure needs!

Scalability Solutions for Growing Needs


When we talk about scalability solutions for growing needs, it's really important to consider what makes a great infrastructure provider. You might think it's all about the latest tech or the biggest servers, but there's so much more to it than that!


First off, let's talk about flexibility. A great infrastructure provider isn't just a one-size-fits-all kind of deal. They should be able to adapt (and quickly) to your changing needs. Imagine your business is booming, and suddenly you need more resources. If your provider can't scale up on demand, you'll find yourself in quite the pickle. Nobody wants to deal with downtime or lagging performance when they're trying to grow!


Next, theres the issue of reliability. You don't want to partner with a provider that's known for outages and slow response times. It's frustrating when you're trying to serve your customers and your infrastructure lets you down. A great provider will have a solid track record, and they should be transparent about their uptime guarantees. If they can't provide that, then maybe it's time to look elsewhere.


Cost-effectiveness is another factor that can't be ignored (even if it's not the most exciting topic). You want a provider that offers value for your money. This doesn't mean you should go for the cheapest option available, though. Sometimes, you really do get what you pay for. So, it's about striking a balance between quality and price. If a provider's fees are too high without clear benefits, it could be a red flag.


Additionally, customer support is crucial! You need to ensure theres a team that's ready to help you whenever things go awry. If you can't get a hold of someone when you've got a problem, that's a huge issue. A great infrastructure provider will offer 24/7 support, so you can rest easy knowing help is always just a call away.


Lastly, let's not forget about innovation. The tech world moves fast, and a great provider should be ahead of the curve. They should be continuously improving their services and offering new solutions that can benefit your business. If they're stuck in the past, you might find yourself falling behind the competition.


In conclusion, choosing the right infrastructure provider is about more than just the features they offer. It's about flexibility, reliability, cost-effectiveness, customer support, and innovation. If you can keep these factors in mind, you'll be well on your way to finding a partner that can help your business grow without any hiccups!

Expertise in Diverse Technology Stacks


When we think about what makes a great infrastructure provider, one things for sure: expertise in diverse technology stacks is absolutely crucial! Its not just about having a single tool or platform that does everything; it's about being flexible and adaptable. You know, in todays fast-paced world, businesses often find themselves juggling multiple technologies, and thats where a provider's real skill shines.


Imagine a company that only understands one type of technology.

Curiosity Hook: What Makes a Great Infrastructure Provider? - providers offering free modem with internet plans

    They might be good at it, but they wont be able to cater to all the needs of their clients. That's a big drawback! A top-notch infrastructure provider should possess knowledge across various stacks, from cloud computing to on-premise solutions, and everything in between.

    Curiosity Hook: What Makes a Great Infrastructure Provider? - providers offering free modem with internet plans

    1. affordable residential VoIP services
    2. reliable internet for student accommodations
    3. internet services with flexible billing options in Newcastle
    This diversity allows them to tailor their services to fit the unique requirements of different clients.


    Moreover, having that wide range of expertise means they can solve problems more effectively. If something goes wrong-and let's be honest, it often does-they need to think on their feet and draw from their broad knowledge base. A provider that's stuck in one lane might struggle when things get messy. It's all about being proactive, not reactive.

    Curiosity Hook: What Makes a Great Infrastructure Provider? - providers offering free modem with internet plans

    1. compliance-ready internet solutions
    2. cost-effective VoIP plans for homes
    3. compliance-ready internet solutions


    Additionally, communication plays an essential role here. A great infrastructure provider doesn't just throw technical jargon at you and expect you to understand. They'll break things down and explain them in a way that makes sense (even to those who aren't tech-savvy). This approach not only builds trust but also fosters collaboration, which is key in a successful partnership.


    In conclusion, a great infrastructure provider isn't just about having the latest and greatest tools. It's about mastering a diverse array of technologies and being able to apply that knowledge effectively. It's the combination of expertise, adaptability, and communication skills that really sets them apart. So, next time youre on the hunt for an infrastructure partner, keep an eye out for that diverse tech stack expertise!

    Customer Support and Service Excellence


    When we think about what makes a great infrastructure provider, it's easy to get lost in technical jargon and complex metrics. But let's be real – it's not just about the latest tech or the fastest servers! A truly exceptional infrastructure provider is one that understands the importance of customer support and service excellence.


    First off, having a reliable infrastructure is crucial, but without the human touch, it can feel cold and unwelcoming. Many providers may boast about their uptime and speed, but if they cant address your concerns in a timely manner, what good is it? It's all about being there when things go wrong (and trust me, they will from time to time). A great provider will have a support team that's not just knowledgeable, but also genuinely interested in solving your problems. They shouldn't just give you a script; they should listen and adapt their solutions to fit your unique needs.


    Also, let's not forget about communication! If a provider can't keep you in the loop about issues or updates, it can lead to frustration.

    Curiosity Hook: What Makes a Great Infrastructure Provider? - network infrastructure solutions for developers

    1. compliance-ready internet solutions
    2. compliance-ready internet solutions
    3. compliance-ready internet solutions
    It's like you're in a relationship where your partner doesnt communicate – it just doesn't work! A good provider keeps you informed, whether its through regular updates or quick responses to your inquiries. They should make you feel valued and reassured, even when things aren't perfect.


    Moreover, curiosity plays a huge role here. A provider that's willing to ask questions and learn about your business can tailor their services to fit you better. They shouldn't just provide a one-size-fits-all solution; they ought to dig deeper and understand what will actually work for you. It's not just about selling a product, it's about forming a partnership that thrives on mutual growth and understanding.


    In conclusion, while the technical aspects of infrastructure are undeniably important, they dont tell the whole story. Customer support and service excellence are what transform a good provider into a great one. So, when searching for that perfect partner, don't just look at the numbers – consider how they treat you, how they communicate, and how curious they are about your needs. That's what really makes a difference!

    Citations and other links

    The following outline is provided as an overview of and topical guide to information technology:

    Information technology (IT) – microelectronics based combination of computing and telecommunications technology to treat information, including in the acquisition, processing, storage and dissemination of vocal, pictorial, textual and numerical information. It is defined by the Information Technology Association of America (ITAA) as "the study, design, development, implementation, support or management of computer-based information systems, particularly toward software applications and computer hardware."

    Different names

    [edit]

    There are different names for this at different periods or through fields. Some of these names are:

    Underlying technology

    [edit]

    History of information technology

    [edit]

    Information technology education and certification

    [edit]

    IT degrees

    [edit]

    Vendor-specific certifications

    [edit]

    Third-party and vendor-neutral certifications

    [edit]

    Third-party commercial organizations and vendor neutral interest groups that sponsor certifications include:

    General certification

    [edit]

    General certification of software practitioners has struggled. The ACM had a professional certification program in the early 1980s, which was discontinued due to lack of interest. Today, the IEEE is certifying software professionals, but only about 500 people have passed the exam by March 2005.

    Information technology and society

    [edit]

    Software Testing

    [edit]

    Further reading

    [edit]
    • Surveillance, Transparency and Democracy: Public Administration in the Information Age. p. 35-57. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa, AL. ISBN 978-0-8173-1877-2

    References

    [edit]
    1. ^ "Information & Communication Technology" (PDF). www.un.org.
    2. ^ "Information technology". Archived from the original on 2013-08-26. Retrieved 2013-08-28.
    3. ^ "Data Communication Technology".
    4. ^ "Creative Digital Technologies".
    5. ^ "Design & technology".
    6. ^ "Communication Technology".
    7. ^ "Bachelor of Science in Information Technology".
    8. ^ "Master of Science in Information Technology".
    9. ^ "Bachelor of Computer Application".
    10. ^ "Master of Computer Applications" (PDF).
    11. ^ "AWS Certification". Amazon Web Services, Inc. Retrieved 22 May 2016.
    12. ^ "Apple - iServices - Technical Training". train.apple.com. Archived from the original on 2001-12-15.
    13. ^ "OCUP Certification - Home Page". Retrieved 22 May 2016.
    14. ^ By Shamus McGuillicuddy, SearchNetworking.com."SolarWinds offers network management training and certification Archived 2009-08-28 at the Wayback Machine." June 24, 2009. Retrieved August 20, 2009.
    15. ^ Haque, Akhlaque (2015). Surveillance, Transparency and Democracy: Public Administration in the Information Age. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press. pp. 35–57. ISBN 978-0-8173-1877-2.

     

    Information technology (IT) is a set of relevant areas within details and communications modern technology (ICT), that incorporate computer system systems, software, programming languages, data and data processing, and storage space. Infotech is an application of computer science and computer system engineering. The term is frequently used as a synonym for computer systems and local area network, but it also incorporates other information circulation technologies such as tv and telephones. Several service or products within an economic climate are associated with infotech, consisting of computer, software application, electronic devices, semiconductors, internet, telecommunications equipment, and ecommerce. An information technology system (IT system) is normally an information system, an interactions system, or, much more specifically talking, a computer system —-- including all equipment, software, and outer tools —-- operated by a restricted team of IT individuals, and an IT project usually describes the commissioning and application of an IT system. IT systems play a vital function in helping with efficient information administration, improving communication networks, and sustaining business procedures throughout numerous markets. Effective IT tasks require thorough planning and ongoing maintenance to ensure optimal functionality and placement with organizational purposes. Although human beings have been storing, obtaining, manipulating, evaluating and communicating info considering that the earliest writing systems were created, the term information technology in its contemporary feeling first appeared in a 1958 article released in the Harvard Business Testimonial; authors Harold J. Leavitt and Thomas L. Whisler commented that "the new technology does not yet have a single well-known name. We will call it infotech (IT)." Their definition includes 3 classifications: strategies for processing, the application of analytical and mathematical methods to decision-making, and the simulation of higher-order analyzing computer system programs.

    .
    Internet history timeline

    Early research and development:

    Merging the networks and creating the Internet:

    Commercialization, privatization, broader access leads to the modern Internet:

    Examples of Internet services:

    The Internet Protocol (IP) is the network layer communications protocol in the Internet protocol suite for relaying datagrams across network boundaries. Its routing function enables internetworking, and essentially establishes the Internet.

    IP has the task of delivering packets from the source host to the destination host solely based on the IP addresses in the packet headers. For this purpose, IP defines packet structures that encapsulate the data to be delivered. It also defines addressing methods that are used to label the datagram with source and destination information. IP was the connectionless datagram service in the original Transmission Control Program introduced by Vint Cerf and Bob Kahn in 1974, which was complemented by a connection-oriented service that became the basis for the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP). The Internet protocol suite is therefore often referred to as TCP/IP.

    The first major version of IP, Internet Protocol version 4 (IPv4), is the dominant protocol of the Internet. Its successor is Internet Protocol version 6 (IPv6), which has been in increasing deployment on the public Internet since around 2006.[1]

    Function

    [edit]
    Encapsulation of application data carried by UDP to a link protocol frame

    The Internet Protocol is responsible for addressing host interfaces, encapsulating data into datagrams (including fragmentation and reassembly) and routing datagrams from a source host interface to a destination host interface across one or more IP networks.[2] For these purposes, the Internet Protocol defines the format of packets and provides an addressing system.

    Each datagram has two components: a header and a payload. The IP header includes a source IP address, a destination IP address, and other metadata needed to route and deliver the datagram. The payload is the data that is transported. This method of nesting the data payload in a packet with a header is called encapsulation.

    IP addressing entails the assignment of IP addresses and associated parameters to host interfaces. The address space is divided into subnets, involving the designation of network prefixes. IP routing is performed by all hosts, as well as routers, whose main function is to transport packets across network boundaries. Routers communicate with one another via specially designed routing protocols, either interior gateway protocols or exterior gateway protocols, as needed for the topology of the network.[3]

    Addressing methods

    [edit]
    Routing schemes
    Unicast

    Broadcast

    Multicast

    Anycast

    There are four principal addressing methods in the Internet Protocol:

    • Unicast delivers a message to a single specific node using a one-to-one association between a sender and destination: each destination address uniquely identifies a single receiver endpoint.
    • Broadcast delivers a message to all nodes in the network using a one-to-all association; a single datagram (or packet) from one sender is routed to all of the possibly multiple endpoints associated with the broadcast address. The network automatically replicates datagrams as needed to reach all the recipients within the scope of the broadcast, which is generally an entire network subnet.
    • Multicast delivers a message to a group of nodes that have expressed interest in receiving the message using a one-to-many-of-many or many-to-many-of-many association; datagrams are routed simultaneously in a single transmission to many recipients. Multicast differs from broadcast in that the destination address designates a subset, not necessarily all, of the accessible nodes.
    • Anycast delivers a message to any one out of a group of nodes, typically the one nearest to the source using a one-to-one-of-many[4] association where datagrams are routed to any single member of a group of potential receivers that are all identified by the same destination address. The routing algorithm selects the single receiver from the group based on which is the nearest according to some distance or cost measure.

    Version history

    [edit]
    A timeline for the development of the transmission control Protocol TCP and Internet Protocol IP
    First Internet demonstration, linking the ARPANET, PRNET, and SATNET on November 22, 1977

    In May 1974, the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) published a paper entitled "A Protocol for Packet Network Intercommunication".[5] The paper's authors, Vint Cerf and Bob Kahn, described an internetworking protocol for sharing resources using packet switching among network nodes. A central control component of this model was the Transmission Control Program that incorporated both connection-oriented links and datagram services between hosts. The monolithic Transmission Control Program was later divided into a modular architecture consisting of the Transmission Control Protocol and User Datagram Protocol at the transport layer and the Internet Protocol at the internet layer. The model became known as the Department of Defense (DoD) Internet Model and Internet protocol suite, and informally as TCP/IP.

    The following Internet Experiment Note (IEN) documents describe the evolution of the Internet Protocol into the modern version of IPv4:[6]

    • IEN 2 Comments on Internet Protocol and TCP (August 1977) describes the need to separate the TCP and Internet Protocol functionalities (which were previously combined). It proposes the first version of the IP header, using 0 for the version field.
    • IEN 26 A Proposed New Internet Header Format (February 1978) describes a version of the IP header that uses a 1-bit version field.
    • IEN 28 Draft Internetwork Protocol Description Version 2 (February 1978) describes IPv2.
    • IEN 41 Internetwork Protocol Specification Version 4 (June 1978) describes the first protocol to be called IPv4. The IP header is different from the modern IPv4 header.
    • IEN 44 Latest Header Formats (June 1978) describes another version of IPv4, also with a header different from the modern IPv4 header.
    • IEN 54 Internetwork Protocol Specification Version 4 (September 1978) is the first description of IPv4 using the header that would become standardized in 1980 as RFC 760.
    • IEN 80
    • IEN 111
    • IEN 123
    • IEN 128/RFC 760 (1980)

    IP versions 1 to 3 were experimental versions, designed between 1973 and 1978.[7] Versions 2 and 3 supported variable-length addresses ranging between 1 and 16 octets (between 8 and 128 bits).[8] An early draft of version 4 supported variable-length addresses of up to 256 octets (up to 2048 bits)[9] but this was later abandoned in favor of a fixed-size 32-bit address in the final version of IPv4. This remains the dominant internetworking protocol in use in the Internet Layer; the number 4 identifies the protocol version, carried in every IP datagram. IPv4 is defined in

    RFC 791 (1981).

    Version number 5 was used by the Internet Stream Protocol, an experimental streaming protocol that was not adopted.[7]

    The successor to IPv4 is IPv6. IPv6 was a result of several years of experimentation and dialog during which various protocol models were proposed, such as TP/IX (

    RFC 1475), PIP (

    RFC 1621) and TUBA (TCP and UDP with Bigger Addresses,

    RFC 1347). Its most prominent difference from version 4 is the size of the addresses. While IPv4 uses 32 bits for addressing, yielding c. 4.3 billion (4.3×109) addresses, IPv6 uses 128-bit addresses providing c. 3.4×1038 addresses. Although adoption of IPv6 has been slow, as of January 2023, most countries in the world show significant adoption of IPv6,[10] with over 41% of Google's traffic being carried over IPv6 connections.[11]

    The assignment of the new protocol as IPv6 was uncertain until due diligence assured that IPv6 had not been used previously.[12] Other Internet Layer protocols have been assigned version numbers,[13] such as 7 (IP/TX), 8 and 9 (historic). Notably, on April 1, 1994, the IETF published an April Fools' Day RfC about IPv9.[14] IPv9 was also used in an alternate proposed address space expansion called TUBA.[15] A 2004 Chinese proposal for an IPv9 protocol appears to be unrelated to all of these, and is not endorsed by the IETF.

    IP version numbers

    [edit]

    As the version number is carried in a 4-bit field, only numbers 0–15 can be assigned.

    IP version Description Year Status
    0 Internet Protocol, pre-v4 N/A Reserved[16]
    1 Experimental version 1973 Obsolete
    2 Experimental version 1977 Obsolete
    3 Experimental version 1978 Obsolete
    4 Internet Protocol version 4 (IPv4)[17] 1981 Active
    5 Internet Stream Protocol (ST) 1979 Obsolete; superseded by ST-II or ST2
    Internet Stream Protocol (ST-II or ST2)[18] 1987 Obsolete; superseded by ST2+
    Internet Stream Protocol (ST2+) 1995 Obsolete
    6 Simple Internet Protocol (SIP) N/A Obsolete; merged into IPv6 in 1995[16]
    Internet Protocol version 6 (IPv6)[19] 1995 Active
    7 TP/IX The Next Internet (IPv7)[20] 1993 Obsolete[21]
    8 P Internet Protocol (PIP)[22] 1994 Obsolete; merged into SIP in 1993
    9 TCP and UDP over Bigger Addresses (TUBA) 1992 Obsolete[23]
    IPv9 1994 April Fools' Day joke[24]
    Chinese IPv9 2004 Abandoned
    10–14 N/A N/A Unassigned
    15 Version field sentinel value N/A Reserved

    Reliability

    [edit]

    The design of the Internet protocol suite adheres to the end-to-end principle, a concept adapted from the CYCLADES project. Under the end-to-end principle, the network infrastructure is considered inherently unreliable at any single network element or transmission medium and is dynamic in terms of the availability of links and nodes. No central monitoring or performance measurement facility exists that tracks or maintains the state of the network. For the benefit of reducing network complexity, the intelligence in the network is located in the end nodes.

    As a consequence of this design, the Internet Protocol only provides best-effort delivery and its service is characterized as unreliable. In network architectural parlance, it is a connectionless protocol, in contrast to connection-oriented communication. Various fault conditions may occur, such as data corruption, packet loss and duplication. Because routing is dynamic, meaning every packet is treated independently, and because the network maintains no state based on the path of prior packets, different packets may be routed to the same destination via different paths, resulting in out-of-order delivery to the receiver.

    All fault conditions in the network must be detected and compensated by the participating end nodes. The upper layer protocols of the Internet protocol suite are responsible for resolving reliability issues. For example, a host may buffer network data to ensure correct ordering before the data is delivered to an application.

    IPv4 provides safeguards to ensure that the header of an IP packet is error-free. A routing node discards packets that fail a header checksum test. Although the Internet Control Message Protocol (ICMP) provides notification of errors, a routing node is not required to notify either end node of errors. IPv6, by contrast, operates without header checksums, since current link layer technology is assumed to provide sufficient error detection.[25][26]

    [edit]

    The dynamic nature of the Internet and the diversity of its components provide no guarantee that any particular path is actually capable of, or suitable for, performing the data transmission requested. One of the technical constraints is the size of data packets possible on a given link. Facilities exist to examine the maximum transmission unit (MTU) size of the local link and Path MTU Discovery can be used for the entire intended path to the destination.[27]

    The IPv4 internetworking layer automatically fragments a datagram into smaller units for transmission when the link MTU is exceeded. IP provides re-ordering of fragments received out of order.[28] An IPv6 network does not perform fragmentation in network elements, but requires end hosts and higher-layer protocols to avoid exceeding the path MTU.[29]

    The Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) is an example of a protocol that adjusts its segment size to be smaller than the MTU. The User Datagram Protocol (UDP) and ICMP disregard MTU size, thereby forcing IP to fragment oversized datagrams.[30]

    Security

    [edit]

    During the design phase of the ARPANET and the early Internet, the security aspects and needs of a public, international network were not adequately anticipated. Consequently, many Internet protocols exhibited vulnerabilities highlighted by network attacks and later security assessments. In 2008, a thorough security assessment and proposed mitigation of problems was published.[31] The IETF has been pursuing further studies.[32]

    See also

    [edit]

    References

    [edit]
    1. ^ The Economics of Transition to Internet Protocol version 6 (IPv6) (Report). OECD Digital Economy Papers. OECD. 2014-11-06. doi:10.1787/5jxt46d07bhc-en. Archived from the original on 2021-03-07. Retrieved 2020-12-04.
    2. ^ Charles M. Kozierok, The TCP/IP Guide, archived from the original on 2019-06-20, retrieved 2017-07-22
    3. ^ "IP Technologies and Migration — EITC". www.eitc.org. Archived from the original on 2021-01-05. Retrieved 2020-12-04.
    4. ^ GoÅ›cieÅ„, Róża; Walkowiak, Krzysztof; Klinkowski, MirosÅ‚aw (2015-03-14). "Tabu search algorithm for routing, modulation and spectrum allocation in elastic optical network with anycast and unicast traffic". Computer Networks. 79: 148–165. doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2014.12.004. ISSN 1389-1286.
    5. ^ Cerf, V.; Kahn, R. (1974). "A Protocol for Packet Network Intercommunication" (PDF). IEEE Transactions on Communications. 22 (5): 637–648. doi:10.1109/TCOM.1974.1092259. ISSN 1558-0857. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2017-01-06. Retrieved 2020-04-06. The authors wish to thank a number of colleagues for helpful comments during early discussions of international network protocols, especially R. Metcalfe, R. Scantlebury, D. Walden, and H. Zimmerman; D. Davies and L. Pouzin who constructively commented on the fragmentation and accounting issues; and S. Crocker who commented on the creation and destruction of associations.
    6. ^ "Internet Experiment Note Index". www.rfc-editor.org. Retrieved 2024-01-21.
    7. ^ a b Stephen Coty (2011-02-11). "Where is IPv1, 2, 3, and 5?". Archived from the original on 2020-08-02. Retrieved 2020-03-25.
    8. ^ Postel, Jonathan B. (February 1978). "Draft Internetwork Protocol Specification Version 2" (PDF). RFC Editor. IEN 28. Retrieved 6 October 2022. Archived 16 May 2019 at the Wayback Machine
    9. ^ Postel, Jonathan B. (June 1978). "Internetwork Protocol Specification Version 4" (PDF). RFC Editor. IEN 41. Retrieved 11 February 2024. Archived 16 May 2019 at the Wayback Machine
    10. ^ Strowes, Stephen (4 Jun 2021). "IPv6 Adoption in 2021". RIPE Labs. Archived from the original on 2021-09-20. Retrieved 2021-09-20.
    11. ^ "IPv6". Google. Archived from the original on 2020-07-14. Retrieved 2023-05-19.
    12. ^ Mulligan, Geoff. "It was almost IPv7". O'Reilly. Archived from the original on 5 July 2015. Retrieved 4 July 2015.
    13. ^ "IP Version Numbers". Internet Assigned Numbers Authority. Archived from the original on 2019-01-18. Retrieved 2019-07-25.
    14. ^ RFC 1606: A Historical Perspective On The Usage Of IP Version 9. April 1, 1994.
    15. ^ Ross Callon (June 1992). TCP and UDP with Bigger Addresses (TUBA), A Simple Proposal for Internet Addressing and Routing. doi:10.17487/RFC1347. RFC 1347.
    16. ^ a b Jeff Doyle; Jennifer Carroll (2006). Routing TCP/IP. Vol. 1 (2 ed.). Cisco Press. p. 8. ISBN 978-1-58705-202-6.
    17. ^ Cite error: The named reference rfc791 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
    18. ^ L. Delgrossi; L. Berger, eds. (August 1995). Internet Stream Protocol Version 2 (ST2) Protocol Specification - Version ST2+. Network Working Group. doi:10.17487/RFC1819. RFC 1819. Historic. Obsoletes RFC 1190 and IEN 119.
    19. ^ Cite error: The named reference rfc8200 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
    20. ^ R. Ullmann (June 1993). TP/IX: The Next Internet. Network Working Group. doi:10.17487/RFC1475. RFC 1475. Historic. Obsoleted by RFC 6814.
    21. ^ C. Pignataro; F. Gont (November 2012). Formally Deprecating Some IPv4 Options. Internet Engineering Task Force. doi:10.17487/RFC6814. ISSN 2070-1721. RFC 6814. Proposed Standard. Obsoletes RFC 1385, 1393, 1475 and 1770.
    22. ^ P. Francis (May 1994). Pip Near-term Architecture. Network Working Group. doi:10.17487/RFC1621. RFC 1621. Historical.
    23. ^ Ross Callon (June 1992). TCP and UDP with Bigger Addresses (TUBA), A Simple Proposal for Internet Addressing and Routing. Network Working Group. doi:10.17487/RFC1347. RFC 1347. Historic.
    24. ^ J. Onions (1 April 1994). A Historical Perspective On The Usage Of IP Version 9. Network Working Group. doi:10.17487/RFC1606. RFC 1606. Informational. This is an April Fools' Day Request for Comments.
    25. ^ RFC 1726 section 6.2
    26. ^ RFC 2460
    27. ^ Rishabh, Anand (2012). Wireless Communication. S. Chand Publishing. ISBN 978-81-219-4055-9. Archived from the original on 2024-06-12. Retrieved 2020-12-11.
    28. ^ Siyan, Karanjit. Inside TCP/IP, New Riders Publishing, 1997. ISBN 1-56205-714-6
    29. ^ Bill Cerveny (2011-07-25). "IPv6 Fragmentation". Arbor Networks. Archived from the original on 2016-09-16. Retrieved 2016-09-10.
    30. ^ Parker, Don (2 November 2010). "Basic Journey of a Packet". Symantec. Symantec. Archived from the original on 20 January 2022. Retrieved 4 May 2014.
    31. ^ Fernando Gont (July 2008), Security Assessment of the Internet Protocol (PDF), CPNI, archived from the original (PDF) on 2010-02-11
    32. ^ F. Gont (July 2011). Security Assessment of the Internet Protocol version 4. doi:10.17487/RFC6274. RFC 6274.
    [edit]

     

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Yes, most providers tailor services to suit your business size, industry, and needs—whether you need full IT management or specific services like helpdesk support, cybersecurity, or cloud migration.

    SUPA Networks  |  ASN Telecom  |  Vision Network  |  Lynham Networks

    Managed IT services involve outsourcing your company’s IT support and infrastructure to a professional provider. This includes monitoring, maintenance, data security, and tech support, allowing you to focus on your business while ensuring your systems stay secure, updated, and running smoothly.

    SUPA Networks  |  ASN Telecom  |  Vision Network  |  Lynham Networks